A summary and assessment of labelling theory

It was also responsible for spurring countless empirical studies over this time period. In general, it seems there are quite a few assumptions and overlooking by labeling's enthusiasts. The stigma from labeling portends this decision to join a sub-culture and also the decision to commit further deviance.

His Crime and Community[5] describing the social interaction involved in crime, is considered a pivotal foundation of modern criminology.

He found that crime is not so much a violation of a penal code as it is an act that outrages society. This theoretically builds a subjective conception of the self, but as others intrude into the reality of that individual's life, this represents objective data which may require a re-evaluation of that conception depending on the authoritativeness of the others' judgment.

On the one hand, a stigmatized person may be told that he is no different from others. Modern testing must be more sophisticated in order to provide validity to a current hypothesis that must be precise.

Following are some of the well-known pioneers in this field, but there are numerous others. In his opening, Becker writes: There could be correlation to the belief that laws are created by the powerful, and those who lack power, break the rules. In this vein, the formation of a deviant identity may lead to weaker bonds to the conventional order.

Labeled individuals may often expect others to devalue and even reject themselves, thereby avoiding situations in which they anticipate that their deviant label may stir up stigma. Formal labeling should influence individual development indirectly through informal labeling, but also directly due to social withdrawal.

A new study could be conducted with testing for no societal reaction and for follow up behavior.

Labeling Theory

A Longitudinal Test of Labeling Theory. These law-breaking individuals are more likely to be labeled due to lower economic and social status, and because they do not possess the means to refute the label. Would an individual respond more to negative societal reaction, or more to the lack of societal reaction?

According to Mead, thought is both a social and pragmatic process, based on the model of two persons discussing how to solve a problem. But in some Islamic countries, zina is a crime and proof of extramarital activity may lead to severe consequences for all concerned.

What transpires in between the informal labeling and the official, or formal labeling? The way out is through a refusal to dramatize the evil. This initial tagging may cause the individual to adopt it as part of their identity.

He says the concept of "affinity" does little to explain the dedication to the behavior. When a person begins to employ his deviant behavior or a role based on it as a means of defense, attack, or adjustment to the overt and covert problems created by the consequent societal reaction to him, his deviation is secondary".

The emphasis on biological determinism and internal explanations of crime were the preeminent force in the theories of the early thirties. Studies in the sociology of deviance. In spite of the common belief that openness and exposure will decrease stereotypes and repression, the opposite is true.

Labeling has, for the most part, looked at only the negative outcome of societal reaction, or the reinforcement of the behavior deviance in question.

Whatever its origins, it seems to provide the basic imagery through which laymen currently conceive themselves. In studying drug addiction, Lemert observed a very powerful and subtle force at work.Labeling theory is the theory of how the self-identity and behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by the terms used to describe or classify them.

It is associated with the concepts of self-fulfilling prophecy and stereotyping. THE ROLE OF LABELLING IN EDUCATION: A FOCUS ON EXCEPTIONAL LEARNERS.

Dr. Wellington Samkange In its attempt to explain the labelling theory, the paper identifies and discusses the different labelling approaches.

Labeling theory

The three approaches to labelling that are discussed in the. The labelling Theory of Crime is associated with Interactionism – the Key ideas are that crime is socially constructed, agents of social control label the powerless as deviant and criminal based on stereotypical assumptions and.

Labeling theory provides a distinctively sociological approach that focuses on the role of social labeling in the development of crime and deviance.

The theory assumes that although deviant. Labeling theory posits that people come to identify and behave in ways that reflect how others label them.

Labeling Theory

It is most commonly associated with the sociology of crime and deviance, where it is used to point out how social processes of labeling and treating someone as criminally deviant actually. After reading numerous assessments, tests, essays and chapters on the labeling theory, the following is an interpretative overview to highlight some of the vast amounts of information that have been written to date.


A summary and assessment of labelling theory
Rated 5/5 based on 81 review